Re:Harder programming questions do a worse job of predicting...
by lovecg on Monday February 18, 2019 @04:39PM
(#19194709)
Go start a company. Hire people without doing any sort of coding interviews. Report back in a year.
The reality is that these are extremely desirable positions with a staggering number of applicants who _do not know how to code_. Not as in “I can’t solve a dynamic programming problem without studying up on it”, but as in literally don’t know what a for loop is.
The process is far from perfect and the frustration is understandable, but it works well enough as a filter from these companies’ point of view.
Re:Harder programming questions do a worse job of predicting...
by castlecrasher2 on Monday February 18, 2019 @06:04PM
(#19195288)
I imagine technical screening is necessary, but in-person coding assessments are nonsensical. It's not like programming is a spectator sport, so why are we tested on it live? I suppose the process is self-selecting, because I personally have given up responding to SV recruiters or interviewing with those companies.
Re:Harder programming questions do a worse job of predicting...
by rpm33 on Monday February 18, 2019 @02:56PM
(#19193800)
Well it started off with Microsoft in the 90's, then Google in 2000's and then it just became common for every company in SV to conduct these programming interviews.
Re:Harder programming questions do a worse job of predicting...
by chooseaname on Monday February 18, 2019 @03:24PM
(#19194056)
I don't see a "good reason" in your comment.
In fact, no, nobody has a good reason for it.