Re:Parents at centre of measles outbreak didn't vaccinate ch...
by mattnewport on Sunday February 17, 2019 @03:46PM
(#19186791)
Presumably if there was an "outbreak" they weren't the only parents not to vaccinate their children. The article doesn't really elaborate on that.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Parents at centre of measles outbreak didn't vaccinate ch...
by masonic on Sunday February 17, 2019 @03:57PM
(#19186859)
The kids caught measles in Vietnam. They were the importing vector.
Re:Parents at centre of measles outbreak didn't vaccinate ch...
by mattnewport on Sunday February 17, 2019 @04:07PM
(#19186921)
But an outbreak implies other children caught measles (the article suggests other children at their school) so they also weren't vaccinated presumably.
Re:Parents at centre of measles outbreak didn't vaccinate ch...
by aiyodev on Sunday February 17, 2019 @05:27PM
(#19187296)
No. The vaccine is only 97% effective. If you’re vaccinated you can still contract the disease.
Re:Parents at centre of measles outbreak didn't vaccinate ch...
by masonic on Sunday February 17, 2019 @05:32PM
(#19187317)
97% under ideal conditions (including 2 doses of quality vaccine). Per the article, the Vietnam health system usually only provides 1.
Re:Parents at centre of measles outbreak didn't vaccinate ch...
by mattnewport on Sunday February 17, 2019 @05:41PM
(#19187369)
That would still prevent an "outbreak" if all the other kids were vaccinated.
Re:Parents at centre of measles outbreak didn't vaccinate ch...
by buchanan on Monday February 18, 2019 @12:23AM
(#19188801)
Measles has a "90% secondary infection rate in susceptible domestic contacts". So, its likely that his brothers were infected as well. That leaves five others.
With the mentioned "97% vaccination success rate under ideal conditions", the fact that they were mixing around in school (and those they infected as well), it does not seem a stretch.