News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Finding Lena Forsen, the Patron Saint of JPEGs by underwater on Saturday February 16, 2019 @09:54PM (#19182398)
Because it makes a significant portion of the population feel objectified?

This is literally what happened to "Lenna" - the image didn't celebrate or honour her as a person. It was an image protraying an unrealistic "beautiful thing". People didn't even know her real name, or what she's achieved as a real person.

It's perfectly reasonable and rational for women to say this makes it harder for them to be perceived as being equals.

Re:Finding Lena Forsen, the Patron Saint of JPEGs by BurningCycles on Sunday February 17, 2019 @12:54AM (#19182882)
So when my two sisters were plastering their walls with very good looking males to which they masturbated, it was making it harder for me as a male to be percieved as being equal ?

Or the fanservice aimed at females in current-day shows like Riverdale where these hot guys throw off their shirts at the hint of an opportunity ?

This idea that it is somehow wrong to appreciate and find pleasure in the physical appearance of people is something I find very hard to understand. Are we going to ban makeup ?

Re:Finding Lena Forsen, the Patron Saint of JPEGs by underwater on Sunday February 17, 2019 @07:13AM (#19184086)
Fair question. I would say the primary difference is that in most workplaces men are seen as being competent, and being male is not a disadvantage or put you in a minority. There are undoubtedly professions where stereotypes about men would be harmful. For example if a man wants to become a flight attendant, nurse, or a school teacher.

Also consider examples outside of work, like dating. The tall, handsome, muscular guy is more likely to be perceived as desirable even though those traits don't necessarily correlate with what makes a good boyfriend. A man in search of a partner might feel objectified if his potential partner had posters of good-looking men up on her wall.

Re:Finding Lena Forsen, the Patron Saint of JPEGs by mial on Sunday February 17, 2019 @11:28AM (#19185209)
Actually, it turns out that even in woman-dominated professions, being a man is advantageous. [1]

[1] The Glass Escalator: Hidden Advantages for Men in the "Female" Professions https://www.jstor.org/stable/3096961

Re:Finding Lena Forsen, the Patron Saint of JPEGs by xanipher on Sunday February 17, 2019 @04:53AM (#19183641)
This is not about personal "pleasure in the physical appearance", but about the culture where using Playboy photos in a professional cobtext doesn't raise any eyebrows.
Re:Finding Lena Forsen, the Patron Saint of JPEGs by ChoGGi on Sunday February 17, 2019 @07:26AM (#19184129)

  where these hot guys throw off their shirts at the hint of an opportunity ?
I don't know why, but I'm reminded of https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=spwTDpJ0-eY
Re:Finding Lena Forsen, the Patron Saint of JPEGs by paulnechifor on Sunday February 17, 2019 @02:31PM (#19186328)
> the image didn't celebrate or honour her as a person. It was an image protraying an unrealistic "beautiful thing". People didn't even know her real name, or what she's achieved as a real person.

Because it's a test image not a novel.

Re:Finding Lena Forsen, the Patron Saint of JPEGs by brokenmachine on Sunday February 17, 2019 @09:05PM (#19188167)
>It was an image protraying an unrealistic "beautiful thing".

Unrealistic?

It's a picture of a woman. What's unrealistic about that? That she's good looking?