> The first is about testing for banned words deliberately.

After being banned for using those words inocuously.

> That isn't an "innocuous reply to harrassment" as you implied in your first comment.

No, that wasn't one of those. It was clearly a joke, however.

> None of the examples of these suspensions were replies to harassment

A fair point. Next time I log into Twitter, I'll make a collection and come back with those, ok? I just didn't happen to have one ready for this discussion at current time.