I'm not sure why one should need to leave the industry one wants to work in before one is afforded a job that doesn't guide one directly towards burnout within 5 years.
And even if these people leave, there's plenty of young blood who'll gladly work in these conditions because they want to make video games, so nothing changes.
The issue of skill transferance is that nobody is forcing them to work in such companies; it means they can leave and try to find another job.
If it's so bad that many people are being forced out, then clearly it meets the bar of unionization being helpful. I'd rather start organizing than quit the industry I love, as the worst that could happen is I get fired (and potentially get a big payout on a subsequent lawsuit), and if it's so bad that the alternative is to leave anyway, it's the same result.
Including stuff like this will get your account banned. Just please leave it out and comment civilly and substantively.
I come to HN to have insightful and interesting discussions with people. Nothing about this part of his comment, nor the tone of the rest of it, is productive, helpful, necessary, respectful or civil.
These aren't rhetorical questions trying to make a point, I'm genuinely curious.