News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on None of my projects want to be SPAs. Parent comment

Re:None of my projects want to be SPAs by slifin on Monday February 11, 2019 @01:11PM (#19136643)
Do Google still use their closure library + compiler on all their big properties? https://github.com/google/closure-library/

I'm learning Clojure at the moment, don't think I would have heard of Google Closure otherwise

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:None of my projects want to be SPAs by nojvek on Tuesday February 12, 2019 @01:03AM (#19141423)
Closure language and closure compiler are two different things. One is a lispy functional language with its own syntax, the other is a jsdoc typechecker and optimizer/monicker.

A lot of what clojure does, Typescript does it really well with it’s types in jsdocs.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:None of my projects want to be SPAs by wilsonthewhale on Tuesday February 12, 2019 @02:24AM (#19141697)
They're related. The ClojureScript compiler uses Google Closure as a backend and runtime library
[ Parent | on HN ]