Re:Brave Privacy Browser Is Whitelisting Trackers of Faceboo...
by bbondy on Monday February 11, 2019 @12:00AM
(#19132192)
Hi Im Brave's CTO.
There's a balance between breaking the web and being as strict as possible. Saying we fully allow Facebook tracking isn't right [1], but we admittedly need more strict-mode like settings for privacy conscious users.
We do block Facebook at least as good as uBlock origin with EasyPrivacy. The referenced code is in a separate component which does the same as Disconnect blocking.
We're taking this seriously internally and we'll iterate on where we are to improve the situation. We're looking at if we can polyfill a local JS resource instead for example as one option if it doesn't make further requests.
Re:Brave Privacy Browser Is Whitelisting Trackers of Faceboo...
by regnerba on Sunday February 10, 2019 @02:05PM
(#19129383)
The related commits are years old. This isn't new. Last commit to that line was 3 years ago with the comment "unblocking embedding of twitter timelines".
I'm trying to figure out if the code is still active case, but this is a quite recent ticket (after the release of the Chromium-based edition, and updated 4 days ago)
Re:Brave Privacy Browser Is Whitelisting Trackers of Faceboo...
by kakarot on Sunday February 10, 2019 @02:13PM
(#19129433)
Then link to the new repo and provide context. Just highlighting a line with absolutely no context is sensationalist. I'm sure there have been public discussions about this.
Re:Brave Privacy Browser Is Whitelisting Trackers of Faceboo...
by microwavecamera on Sunday February 10, 2019 @03:06PM
(#19129677)
I'm sure there have been public discussions about this.
Can you substantiate this? Because that would be extremely relevant to the conversation. Making statements with absolutely no context just seems sensationalistic.
Re:Brave Privacy Browser Is Whitelisting Trackers of Faceboo...
by threatofrain on Sunday February 10, 2019 @04:20PM
(#19130104)
If you're sure that there's been public discussion about the matter, then surely you won't have to spend too much time looking it up on Google? Backing up assertions takes energy. Are you motivated enough to champion your own assertions?
There's a balance between breaking the web and being as strict as possible. Saying we fully allow Facebook tracking isn't right [1], but we admittedly need more strict-mode like settings for privacy conscious users.
We do block Facebook at least as good as uBlock origin with EasyPrivacy. The referenced code is in a separate component which does the same as Disconnect blocking.
We're taking this seriously internally and we'll iterate on where we are to improve the situation. We're looking at if we can polyfill a local JS resource instead for example as one option if it doesn't make further requests.
[1]: https://github.com/brave/adblock-lists/blob/f25b698aff4666bb...
https://github.com/brave/adblock-lists/blob/f25b698aff4666bb...
https://github.com/brave/adblock-lists/blob/f25b698aff4666bb...
a better solution for what, i wonder
https://github.com/brave/browser-laptop/commit/c4cd7c1dc41a0...
https://github.com/brave/browser-laptop/commit/6edf56775f256...
https://github.com/brave/browser-laptop/commit/4c30cd08af9dd...
https://github.com/brave/browser-laptop/commit/0652274db0aee...
https://github.com/brave/browser-laptop/commit/c4cd7c1dc41a0...
Also I just realized that is an archived repo that isn't used any more.
I took a quick look through the newer repos and couldn't find any kind of hard coded whitelist like that.
Am I missing something?
https://imgur.com/a/M4B9kJ2
I'm trying to figure out if the code is still active case, but this is a quite recent ticket (after the release of the Chromium-based edition, and updated 4 days ago)
The whitelist is in both versions
It is still whitelisted in current.
> // Temporary whitelist until we find a better solution
This post is sensationalist, flagged.
Can you substantiate this? Because that would be extremely relevant to the conversation. Making statements with absolutely no context just seems sensationalistic.