News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation backtracks on one-year ... by chrisco255 on Tuesday February 05, 2019 @04:41PM (#19090127)
People aren't easily replaceable...especially high talent individuals. It's also a big burden for an organization to pay for non-productive workers. And if someone has several children in a row...then what? What are the limits?
Re:Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation backtracks on one-year ... by fastbeef on Tuesday February 05, 2019 @04:55PM (#19090293)
Its paid by the government, funded by taxes, at the same level as sick leave/disability. Some (most) companies actually chip in a little (or a lot) to ease the income loss as a perk.
Re:Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation backtracks on one-year ... by tomp on Tuesday February 05, 2019 @04:47PM (#19090186)
> It's also a big burden for an organization to pay for non-productive workers

That's absolutely true, but hopefully the government (or social security) pays for it. Same as for medical leave (in Slovenia, only after 30 days though - first month is paid by the employer). That way, the government is supporting entrepreneurship and small businesses, which would otherwise be disproportionally affected by a single person leaving (in a big company, the law of large numbers makes it easy to predict, and therefore manage, absences).

Re:Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation backtracks on one-year ... by Fomite on Tuesday February 05, 2019 @05:16PM (#19090527)
This would make more sense if the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation wasn't also notorious for having extremely high turnover.
Re:Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation backtracks on one-year ... by minikites on Tuesday February 05, 2019 @04:47PM (#19090182)
Are you implying that someone will try to game the system by perpetually having children for a decade or more?