Article 13 Is Back On: Worse, Not Better

Re:Article 13 Is Back On: Worse, Not Better by c3o on Tuesday February 05, 2019 @08:02AM (#19084870)

This doesn't seem to be a for-profit service, so it's outside of the scope of the latest drafts of Article 13 thankfully. As long as you never put ads on it, you're good.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Article 13 Is Back On: Worse, Not Better by zaarn on Tuesday February 05, 2019 @10:25AM (#19086092)

The french draft includes services older than 3 years.

The new proposal that the french are pushing has the following conditions which must ALL be met:

    Available to the public for less than 3 years
    Annual turnover below €10 million
    Fewer than 5 million unique monthly visitors

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Article 13 Is Back On: Worse, Not Better by c3o on Tuesday February 05, 2019 @06:00PM (#19090954)

Another provision of the article limits its scope to services that "organise and promote" user-posted/uploaded content "for profit-making purposes".

The 3 criteria you quoted then further narrow which of the services matching the above provision need to deploy upload filters.

Come to think of it, the pastebin-like site is actually already excluded by the "organise and promote" criterium, regardless of whether it's profit-oriented or not.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Article 13 Is Back On: Worse, Not Better by pmlnr on Tuesday February 05, 2019 @08:05AM (#19084898)

> As long as you never put ads on it, you're good.

Nonprofit doesn't mean it can't make money.

[ Parent | on HN ]