He obviously went and reviewed the rest, or how would he know about the uWebsockets portion? His point is that the article is poorly written enough that he had no desire to finish it, and I fully agree. More information and less disparaging fluff would make this piece much more attractive to the engineers of the world.

I stopped around the graph ("No so called “web framework” for Node.js, whether Fastify or not, can surpass the red line").

It didn't seem to point to some novel work, just to be some kind of piss take on Node.