Insurance Company Says NotPetya Is an “Act of War”, Refuses to Pay

Re:Insurance Company Says NotPetya Is an “Act of War”, Refus... by jaredklewis on Saturday February 02, 2019 @10:11PM (#19067570)

You are making the following argument:

1. Anthem Insurance stole from policy holders. 2. Ergo, Zurich Insurance stole from Mondelez.

If you are going to make a claim that all insurers are systematically stealing from their customers, I think you are a long way off. So Toyota sometimes ships cars with bad breaks. Ergo all car companies are trying to kill drivers?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Insurance Company Says NotPetya Is an “Act of War”, Refus... by benologist on Saturday February 02, 2019 @10:16PM (#19067587)

Are health insurance companies abnormal or representative of non-health insurance companies? Zurich Insurance doesn't look better at all based on the submitted article -

    specifically covered “all risks of physical loss or 
    damage” and “all risk of physical loss or damage to 
    electronic data, programs or software” due to “the 
    malicious introduction of a machine code or instruction.”

[ Parent | on HN ]