Re:Foxconn Is Reconsidering Plan for Manufacturing in Wisconsin
by pionar on Thursday January 31, 2019 @08:59AM
(#19044700)
Not always. There's usually exemptions, not that I know how that applies here.
I used to (mid-2000s) work for a SaaS company whose main customers were municipalities and universities in the US. We always had NDAs on file for customers we did business with. It was SOP.
We weren't swindling them out of billions of dollars, though. It was something that had prices in the 30k-40k annually range.
Re:Foxconn Is Reconsidering Plan for Manufacturing in Wisconsin
by duxup on Thursday January 31, 2019 @09:29AM
(#19044888)
I can certainly see room for exemptions. Like if your SaaS covers police investigations in progress and such, makes a lot of sense that they don't fork over anything with that or sensitive architecture information.
But general terms of a deal and etc.... that's just gotta be known.
Re:Foxconn Is Reconsidering Plan for Manufacturing in Wisconsin
by Scoundreller on Wednesday January 30, 2019 @06:43PM
(#19040845)
I can't speak for Wisconsin, but the laws are usually riddled with exemptions. E.g. records sensitive to a 3rd party.
Gotta think that would run afoul of open records laws and open meetings laws and etc...