Sadly, in today's environment, science that conflicts with certain agenda have become blasphemy. It's reminiscent of the anti-science and anti-intellectual days of geocentrism and the catholic church. It's amazing how one of the great scientists of our time has been "excommunicated" and attacked mercilessly for his blashphemy. The strange thing is that the media is using racism themselves to attack the guy.
How does that relate to this article?
In your assessment, are Watson's claims about race well supported by good science?
I’ll grant that serious scientists are cautious about this, but what’s your evidence that the caution has gone too far?
We know that traits like intelligence are affected by hundreds or thousands of distinct genetic loci. We know that traits like measured intelligence are hugely dependent on non-genetic factors like diet, environmental exposures, and poverty (and that these factors aren’t orthogonal to each other). And we also know that scientists in the past have made too-sweeping claims that in the light of modern data are considered not just wrong, but embarrassingly so, and that these claims have been weaponized by overzealous lay people. Given all that, I think it’s quite reasonable to be very cautious about making claims that there’s not great evidence to support.
We don't really know how DNA affects cognitive ability in general, much less what if any affect ethnicity or gender has.
We don't know the basics because we can't even define the independent variable. What exactly is "cognitive ability" anyway? The definition of "cognition" is far more social and cultural than physical, so how do you measure it without social and cultural bias?
After we understand cognition, then we can examine how nutrition, education, social interactions, early childhood experiences, and other environmental factors affect it.
That's what we really should be talking about. But it's dangerous and counterproductive to leapfrog our current knowledge by measuring all groups against a socially and culturally biased standard with environmental factors we can't control and that we don't truly understand.
That's why we need to study, come up with theories, disprove them, and find better theories. When it comes to race and gender, there's too much stigma attach to even try and come up with incorrect theories.
However, we should really be talking about this.
- We know that genes affect our physical appearance (hence races are distinguishable between each other).
- We know that different races have genetic predisposition to certain diseases (sickle cell disease and people of African ancestry, for example).
- We know that genetic studies reveal fascinating history of how people migrated across the globe and how nations are mostly a fictional invention.
- We know how genes affect anything from eye color to horrible conditions like Roberts syndrome
But we are too afraid to talk about anything beyond these few topics, and how genetic differences between races affect (negatively, neutrally, or positively) people of these races.