Memory usage of a toy C# server and client with 500K concurrent connections on

Re:Memory usage of a toy C# server and client with 500K conc... by dmarlow on Saturday January 26, 2019 @05:05PM (#19008816)

The are startups using it. We're just not in the MS bashing bandwagon you see here on hn.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Memory usage of a toy C# server and client with 500K conc... by bauerd on Saturday January 26, 2019 @05:23PM (#19008922)

I don't get the impression that C# is bashed on HN, rather the opposite

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Memory usage of a toy C# server and client with 500K conc... by vezycash on Saturday January 26, 2019 @10:03PM (#19010127)

They said "MS bashing" not C# bashing. In other words, using anything MS was once considered uncool. There's still a number of people who are waiting to catch MS pull a Embrace... stunt.

I've not seen any thread on HN bashing MS without reason. However, the only guys who claim to use C# either work with big companies or freelance.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Memory usage of a toy C# server and client with 500K conc... by NicoJuicy on Sunday January 27, 2019 @05:15AM (#19011164)

MS basshing was only based on the M$ quote. Because it was closed source.

Some context has shifted, the Microsoft takes over Github part has shown sentiment shift also ( not everyone of course)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Memory usage of a toy C# server and client with 500K conc... by tracker1 on Sunday January 27, 2019 @11:36PM (#19015349)

I'm not specifically anti-MS myself and am generally supportive of their OSS moves. I think it aligns well with their SaaS initiatives (Office365, Azure, etc) and think that it will continue.

Beyond that, MS does deserve the skepticism it gets, and I'm not a fan of the "M$" references or similar. Leadership at MS has changed and it does show. I do wish they'd stop doing sleazy things with windows though. I've been using more Linux and Mac as a result.

[ Parent | on HN ]