News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Google Search Operators: A Complete List (2018) by dekhn on Thursday January 24, 2019 @12:37PM (#18990857)
most of the operators on that table have existed for over ten years and it's unlikely they will be removed.
Re:Google Search Operators: A Complete List (2018) by nkurz on Thursday January 24, 2019 @01:19PM (#18991308)
What give you this confidence? I discovered the list when I was trying to figure out why "link:" was no longer working, after existing for more than a decade. In another comment here, TeMPOraL says that "define:" (which is on the list) doesn't seem to be supported any more. If it's not making money for Google, and it's not necessary for their internal activities, I wouldn't want to depend on any of these to work in the future.
Re:Google Search Operators: A Complete List (2018) by na412 on Friday January 25, 2019 @09:57AM (#18998409)
The + operator was removed despite being there for a long time.

Also there's a whole bunch of wrong info in the article. The most blatant one is that they claim google by default performs an AND search, which even a cursory use of google will demonstrate is not true.

Re:Google Search Operators: A Complete List (2018) by Rebelgecko on Thursday January 24, 2019 @03:58PM (#18992881)
Most work, but about 1/4 of them don't :(
Re:Google Search Operators: A Complete List (2018) by dekhn on Thursday January 24, 2019 @04:48PM (#18993348)
link was intentionally removed, I think about a year ago, with some messaging to the community. I would guess it was being abused.
Re:Google Search Operators: A Complete List (2018) by throwaway12iii on Friday January 25, 2019 @02:18AM (#18996156)
By abused you probably meant abused without payment to Google, or abused by people external to Google. People who pay or are Google can continue their abuse.