News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Google Urged the U.S. to Limit Protection for Activist Wo... by wasdfff on Thursday January 24, 2019 @11:58AM (#18990424)
In every context besides economic journals it refers to social liberalism: the progressive left. No one is calling reagan or bush liberals even if they are by the economics definition of the word.
Re:Google Urged the U.S. to Limit Protection for Activist Wo... by Tiktaalik on Thursday January 24, 2019 @01:42PM (#18991576)
You can be "socially liberal" and not be terribly progressive at all, and in fact that's what I usually see in the tech industry.

Eg. Support gay rights and environmental causes, but don't really give a shit about poor people.

Re:Google Urged the U.S. to Limit Protection for Activist Wo... by typon on Thursday January 24, 2019 @02:16PM (#18991938)
That has been my experience as well
Re:Google Urged the U.S. to Limit Protection for Activist Wo... by username90 on Thursday January 24, 2019 @12:05PM (#18990507)
But "being very liberal" is not the same as "being very pro USA Democrats".

Liberals are often right wing parties in other countries. Basically you have a scale from socialism where everything in your life is dictated by social contracts to liberalism where almost nothing in your life is dictated by social contracts. The left in the US calling themselves liberals is kinda like the north korea calling themselves "democratic people's republicc". Their only liberal agenda is freedom from the Christian social contract.

Re:Google Urged the U.S. to Limit Protection for Activist Wo... by asdff on Thursday January 24, 2019 @12:33PM (#18990812)
Yet we are on a U.S. based website talking about a U.S. company and its American workforce and a story published in a U.S. newspaper, so we will stick with the common convention and not go on semantics tangents.
Re:Google Urged the U.S. to Limit Protection for Activist Wo... by kome on Thursday January 24, 2019 @01:18PM (#18991300)
we are on the internet