Re:Pear.php.net shuts down after maintainers discover seriou...
by acdha on Thursday January 24, 2019 @08:50AM
(#18988600)
The challenge for comparisons is doing it all offline and indistinguishable from user activity - I’ve seen cases where the attacker updated tripwire, rpm/deb sums, etc. or only presented the payload to a specific process, requesting IP not on the local network, etc. In this case I’d want something like a random process where a new EC2 instance does a install so you could make it a lot harder to cloak the attack because that’s also what many targets will do.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
There are no comments on this comment yet.