Re:Remote code execution vulnerability in apt/apt-get
by giovannibajo1 on Wednesday January 23, 2019 @12:03AM
(#18975801)
Even ignoring the fact that there are far better libraries than OpenSSL today (eg: BoringSSL), apt already implements a sandbox-like approach (as the article explains); I'm not sure if the subprocesses are actually sandboxed, but obviously they should and at that point, a vulnerability like the one you cited shouldn't let the attacker escape the very narrow sandbox.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
There are no comments on this comment yet.