Re:Ray Kurzweil: AI is still on course to outpace human inte...
by baq on Monday January 21, 2019 @04:56PM
(#18963976)
if you get CPUs to exchange their designs in quasi-sexual activities and let them multiply and evolve on their own, maybe. right now the competitive pressure is on their designers.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Ray Kurzweil: AI is still on course to outpace human inte...
by ben_w on Monday January 21, 2019 @05:16PM
(#18964140)
My understanding is that for at least three years now chip feature size has been on a scale where the design software has to evolve (as in: their algorithm is simulated evolution) physical solutions to the logic-level designs to avoid unintentional self interaction, both quantum tunnelling and classical e.g. capacitance. Humans can’t do that for multi-billion transistor chips.
Re:Ray Kurzweil: AI is still on course to outpace human inte...
by state_less on Monday January 21, 2019 @06:04PM
(#18964457)
First off, that sounds pretty hot. :) Second, if there is reproductive variation and selection, I think it's evolution. We take our old CPU design and make a new variation, that's the reproductive variation part. We also have a market select for which designs survive via purchases or lack thereof, the selection part. It doesn't matter to me so much if a life form that hosts it, a computer hosts it or a human mind.
Re:Ray Kurzweil: AI is still on course to outpace human inte...
by ZoomZoomZoom on Monday January 21, 2019 @07:00PM
(#18964807)
There's your ubiquitous singularity lurking somewhere near. Symbiosis between CPU and a Human advancing CPU's evolution. Not exactly what we were promised!