News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A Short Rebuttal to Searle (1984) [pdf] by goatlover on Saturday January 19, 2019 @05:59PM (#18949759)
There is a difference for Searle if only certain kinds of physical systems are conscious.

The other issue in philosophy of mind is intentionality, which is how any physical system can be about something. Humans are both conscious and possess beliefs, desires and what not.

Re:A Short Rebuttal to Searle (1984) [pdf] by naasking on Saturday January 19, 2019 @08:25PM (#18950364)
> There is a difference for Searle if only certain kinds of physical systems are conscious

There is no meaningful difference here either. Physical systems also have bounded information content as per the Bekenstein Bound.

> The other issue in philosophy of mind is intentionality, which is how any physical system can be about something

I don't see the great disconnect here either. You have to treat systems of general intelligence as if they have intentions. What else is there?