Re:After GDPR, The New York Times cut off ad exchanges and k...
by jethro_tell on Wednesday January 16, 2019 @05:48PM
(#18926296)
To show the ad to the consumer? I'd say yes. To sell the ad, when google is selling hyper informative profiles down the road. Maybe not. Not that people who buy ads or keywords or whatever have the best idea of who they should sell it to
Re:After GDPR, The New York Times cut off ad exchanges and k...
by seem_2211 on Wednesday January 16, 2019 @06:09PM
(#18926499)
But also, if it's general interest that makes sense as well. Say an ad for BestBuy while browsing the NYT. That's one of the benefits of well trafficked sites - you can reach a pretty wide swath of the population.
Re:After GDPR, The New York Times cut off ad exchanges and k...
by kiriakasis on Wednesday January 16, 2019 @06:45PM
(#18926806)
In this sense I would like it if site took advertisement more seriously. Asking feedback, allowing personalization, selecting a few "endorsed" ads (as a quick and cheap Boolean review).
For Google and Facebook it doesn't make sense, but for a newspaper i would expect some selection on the ads they show.
This seems to me what "targeted advertising" should mean - NYT says "for all routes of nytimes.com/politics, show political ads. If it's local news, open it up to classifieds for local business." Etc.
If someone's on the page, is that not enough information?