News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on 99% code coverage (2017). Parent comment

Re:99% code coverage (2017) by jesusmg on Wednesday January 16, 2019 @05:16AM (#18919612)
Me neither, I liked the concept of mutation testing. (I was using this performing changes manually, without knowing this technique has a nice name). I would appreciate if somebody points out a mutation framework /tools for .net
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:99% code coverage (2017) by purity_resigns on Wednesday January 16, 2019 @07:03AM (#18920094)
https://github.com/fscheck/FsCheck is something I've used very briefly in the past. I did more work with this sort of thing in Scala.

In my experience, you usually end up with much more coverage than you want or need.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:99% code coverage (2017) by mdpopescu on Wednesday January 16, 2019 @11:59AM (#18922477)
There's something that used to be called Pex, and now is apparently called IntelliTest [1], but I believe it's only available in the Enterprise edition of Visual Studio.

[1] https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/visualstudio/test/intellite...

[ Parent | on HN ]