Re:Avoiding a transit of the United States
by perfmode on Tuesday January 15, 2019 @11:47AM
(#18912489)
“You should exercise your right to vote”
“Clearly, since this is the policy, it indicates that this is the will of the American people and a majority support the policy.”
Re:Avoiding a transit of the United States
by JohnFen on Tuesday January 15, 2019 @11:51AM
(#18912523)
It indicates no such thing.
Re:Avoiding a transit of the United States
by perfmode on Tuesday January 15, 2019 @11:56AM
(#18912578)
Agreed!
Re:Avoiding a transit of the United States
by SamReidHughes on Tuesday January 15, 2019 @01:17PM
(#18913441)
The sane thing about it is that it keeps the rule system simpler.
Re:Avoiding a transit of the United States
by dsfyu404ed on Tuesday January 15, 2019 @12:02PM
(#18912649)
So vote for someone else the next time around and tweet @$incumbent (or let them know in some other way) that you just voted for $othercanidate because they do not take your concerns about $subject seriously enough. Basically just be vocal about your issue.
Re:Avoiding a transit of the United States
by marssaxman on Tuesday January 15, 2019 @12:11PM
(#18912739)
The list of current policies which are wildly unjust or flat-out insane, and for which this strategy would have to be applied, is always much longer than the list of candidates. There are no US elections, ever, in which it is possible to vote for any candidate who would not have to receive a long list of such twitter posts. I don't see how this strategy can work.
Re:Avoiding a transit of the United States
by mLuby on Tuesday January 15, 2019 @12:52PM
(#18913191)
In a republic that doesn't work. Citizens have one lever to control policy: vote for or against their representative. We see this all the time with statements like "I don't like X's view on abortion but I think Y's position on climate change is even more damaging so I'm voting for X."
Re:Avoiding a transit of the United States
by komali2 on Tuesday January 15, 2019 @01:24PM
(#18913497)
Do you believe this will have an effect?
Re:Avoiding a transit of the United States
by andersonvom on Tuesday January 15, 2019 @01:57PM
(#18913810)
Probably not in the short term and only if enough people start doing it. I like the idea of making it clear for the people you're voting for and against why you're voting/not voting for them. Hopefully, it'll influence their future platforms.
Re:Avoiding a transit of the United States
by owenmarshall on Tuesday January 15, 2019 @02:32PM
(#18914134)
If you contact your congresscritter over their official congressional channels - email, phone, Twitter, plain ol' letter - and tell them you plan to vote for/against them because of $X, a very polite intern will tell you that they will record your support/opposition to $X but that they cannot pass along your comment on voting to your congresscritter.
Be sure to share that with their campaign: that's how you get that message through.
Re:Avoiding a transit of the United States
by dsfyu404ed on Tuesday January 15, 2019 @02:40PM
(#18914205)
They can't "pass along your message" specifically but when they get several hundred people saying they didn't vote for $boss because of their stance on $issue they will find a way to let $boss know about the pattern.
It's a bad idea. It shouldn't be that way.