News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:SSD Storage: 2018 in review by franciscop on Tuesday January 15, 2019 @01:17AM (#18909158)
No it is not, I linked to the external Thunderbolt SSD (last one) so there are many more pieces involved in the Samsung SSD. But it's true that the Apple one is a lot faster since it's internal.
Re:SSD Storage: 2018 in review by dylan604 on Tuesday January 15, 2019 @01:33AM (#18909218)
Sure, it connects via thunderbolt, but it's still just a SATA style SSD (max speeds around 550MBps). I'd love to find an external M.2 to get 1200MBps via external, but this seems to be a unicorn still. Although, I'm still happy to have 550MBps on a SATA SSD vs 110MBps via platters.
Re:SSD Storage: 2018 in review by franciscop on Tuesday January 15, 2019 @02:53AM (#18909458)
Here you go, 3412MBps (read) and 1884MBps (write) for the Samsung X5: https://www.techradar.com/reviews/samsung-x5-portable-ssd

Granted, it's a heck lot more expensive at 1TB for $700. It seems the only reason for this drive to exist is actual transfer speed because in any other way seems worse than the T5.

Re:SSD Storage: 2018 in review by stephenr on Tuesday January 15, 2019 @07:13AM (#18910615)
If you want USB, forget it. The best you'll get from a USB 3.1Gen2 > NVMe case is about 1GB/sec.

If you're willing (to pay) and able (to plug it in) to use Thunderbolt 3, there are several commercial products that use an NVMe internally and boast up to 2500MB/sec.

Re:SSD Storage: 2018 in review by akvadrako on Tuesday January 15, 2019 @03:55AM (#18909753)
I have one of those drives - it's not Thunderbolt, just USB 3.1 gen 2.

It's also not a 2.5" drive since it's obviously smaller.

Re:SSD Storage: 2018 in review by franciscop on Tuesday January 15, 2019 @11:50AM (#18912515)
Oops, that's on me :)