To my ears, drones are far more annoying than either the constant whoosh-whrrr of the road, or the occasional rumble of a heavy airliner (narrow bodies and GA planes make way less noise - it's the A380s and 747s that make enough noise to make me look up). The pitch of the quad rotors is higher, which to most people, is a more invasive sound.
Unless it's driven by one of those jerks who mod their exhaust, that is.
[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V5DYre_EZKU - I've heard more annoying sounds, but this is probably in my top ten, or fifteen.
That being said NIMBYism isn't always logical. Even if you presented a plan that proves their would be no increase in noise, I could see a lot of people not believing it.
Drones emit a high pitch whine that is annoying and irritating, and ruins plenty of quite natural viewpoints with assholes trying to get that pullback shot for their vlog.
This isn't NIMBYism or Ludditeness - I'm pro drones for practical uses. I'm anti Drones X Instagram Influencer culture that permeates hikes, and stresses out my dog (who is even more sensitive to high pitched noises than I am)
All of this annoys the hell out of me, but no one else seems to care. Certainly not enough to ban any of it.
a lawnmower, a string trimmer, or a leaf blower
All of these are used in daytime almost exclusively.For delivery, would using a (possibly guided) parachute be an option sometimes? For example if there is a landing target left in someone's yard.
You can't escape the physics that moving air causes noise.
Translation: "You go inside if you want peace and quiet. The outside is only for the self-entitled now."
NASA did a study and found that the noise drones make is perceived to be more annoying than those from cars [1]. They acknowledge noise-based pushback as an issue, even if they're no louder than cars.
[1] https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/201700...