Re:Why Is Storage on Kubernetes So Hard?
by YZF on Sunday January 13, 2019 @08:08PM
(#18899822)
I'm not sure this is necessarily true. 2 x 40Gbps is bandwidth which is typically not the limiting factor. If it was you can go with higher bandwidth like FC. RDS is a database service, not SAN. Look at SAN boxes from storage companies, you can get things like 60 SSDs in a single box. To match the IOPs of that you'd need a lot of servers with local storage. I think in general dis-aggregating compute and storage is the optimal approach, whether some particular solution is better/price effective is a different question. Having all your drives in a box means they're easier to share, easier to service, easier to replace the servers as well ... lots of wins there.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
If you're doing it locally, you'd ideally use RAID with a battery backed unit and your fsync essentially end up going to memory.
Re:Why Is Storage on Kubernetes So Hard?
by zbentley on Sunday January 13, 2019 @11:50PM
(#18900749)
Until a battery relearn takes your app down in the middle of the night. I don't miss those.
The servers I buy now have large capacitors which don't fail like batteries, and you can then have the server on a UPS