News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ricochet-IM: Anonymous, decentralized, metadata-resistant... by jstanley on Sunday January 13, 2019 @03:55PM (#18898629)
Sure, then you'd get N contact requests which you'd have to ignore (which has the same effect as deleting a contact which you'd previously accepted).

But people can spam your email account as well. When this became a problem, spam filters were developed. There's no reason the same thing couldn't happen in Ricochet if spam became a problem.

Ricochet's problem isn't that too many spammers are using it. It's that almost nobody at all is using it.

Re:Ricochet-IM: Anonymous, decentralized, metadata-resistant... by dfabulich on Sunday January 13, 2019 @04:34PM (#18898846)
Email spam filters didn't/don't actually work that well without de-anonymizing features like SPF and DKIM.

I'm not saying that spam is a problem today, but that the design goals of Richochet don't allow it to deal with the spam problem for users who actually want anonymous messaging.

Re:Ricochet-IM: Anonymous, decentralized, metadata-resistant... by jstanley on Sunday January 13, 2019 @05:37PM (#18899155)
What anonymous messaging system would you recommend?