News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:SpaceX to lay off 10% of Workforce by a-saleh on Saturday January 12, 2019 @05:41AM (#18890644)
Well, there are social contracts, and if you violate them, there are repercussions.

There are many social contracts tied to the word 'employee'. Expectation of livable vage. Expectation of stability. I liked the way patio11 once explained it (I think, and definitely am paraphrasing): "If you employ people and business is good, you get all of the profits and only owe them their wage. If business is bad, you still owe them their wage."

I am concerned that many companies are trying to weasel out of this unspoken contract. I remember McDonalds document specifying that they assume their employees have second jobs. Or that many game companies fire their QA teams every time a game is shipped.

Like, I get the incentive, I just don't like it.

To be honest, I wouldn't miss Tesla or Space X if it turns out they can't manage their employees.

Re:SpaceX to lay off 10% of Workforce by sokoloff on Saturday January 12, 2019 @08:21AM (#18891044)
You absolutely owe them their wage for the time they worked. You don't owe them their job and wage for an indefinite amount of time going forward.
Re:SpaceX to lay off 10% of Workforce by Dylan16807 on Saturday January 12, 2019 @05:07PM (#18893544)
> There are many social contracts tied to the word 'employee'. Expectation of livable vage. Expectation of stability.

If you fire 10% of your staff every 3 or 4 years, plus 1% the other years, that means the average employee has decades of job stability. That's probably enough.