News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ask HN: What would your ideal issue tracker look like? by alangibson on Friday January 11, 2019 @02:40PM (#18886192)
> entire issue tracker hosted/versioned in git

I've been mulling over something like that. I don't see why issue tracker, documentation store (wiki, etc), and source code repo need to be separate. Seems more like path dependency more than reasoned choice.

Re:Ask HN: What would your ideal issue tracker look like? by liveoneggs on Friday January 11, 2019 @02:46PM (#18886259)
Re:Ask HN: What would your ideal issue tracker look like? by myownlittlworld on Saturday January 12, 2019 @01:17PM (#18892475)
I wish there was some way to modify fossil data from within the repository itself. Like, if fossil's bug list were duplicated as files in the issues/ folder, and I could edit the bugs individually as files.

Yeah, if there were some way to combine fossil and org-mode, that would be perfect. As it is, fossil by itself comes pretty darn close for me.

Re:Ask HN: What would your ideal issue tracker look like? by michaelmure on Friday January 11, 2019 @04:49PM (#18887491)
https://github.com/MichaelMure/git-bug

I very much welcome any help to make that happen :-)