Re:Most of What We Read on the Internet is Written by Insane...
by gniv on Friday January 11, 2019 @02:27PM
(#18886097)
That's a good point. It could be that since we don't know how to scale curation (and use upvotes as a proxy), we exacerbate the problem of lurkers not having their (few) comments discovered.
As a counter-example, I find the "editor's picks" comments on some New York Times articles to be high quality and quite diverse. But that model, of course, doesn't scale.
The content is there, by lesser known figures and lurkers alike. Itβs just hard to discover. You need to stumble upon it by accident, instead of by a deliberate process like consuming the top upvoted posts.