I wouldn't say all of those things are bad things.
I'd hope even the smallest of startups is thinking about how users interact with their software and organizing those interactions into some sort of prioritized backlog for development.
Re:Startups Rejecting Venture Capital
by woolvalley on Friday January 11, 2019 @05:04PM
(#18887627)
We definitely have a planning process, I do write things down into design docs, and do keep track of things in some spreadsheets, docs and tickets. But I don't find it an excessive, oppressive or impractical process, which is probably what the parent post is hinting to.
I would love to know about the list of "good" big companies (and good teams within them). In my direct experience, the big companies are soul crushing and monotonous and one is surrounded by mediocrity.
Re:Startups Rejecting Venture Capital
by woolvalley on Friday January 11, 2019 @05:03PM
(#18887620)
The best way to find out is to go interview at big cos, and ask them about all of your worries about process. One team can have a ton of process, the other can barely have any. It's really mostly a team and department basis thing.
In my limited experience in talking with other people, FAANG tends to not have as much process as finance, IBM, insurance or other 'boring big companies'.
Maybe go to another big co?