Anonymous Google Employees Voted Arms Control Persons of the Year

Re:Anonymous Google Employees Voted Arms Control Persons of ... by abugheratwork on Thursday January 10, 2019 @04:39PM (#18878485)

You just claimed that if we don't get them they'll get us, and then called someone childish.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Anonymous Google Employees Voted Arms Control Persons of ... by darawk on Thursday January 10, 2019 @05:15PM (#18878822)

> You just claimed that if we don't get them they'll get us

No I didn't. Read what I said again.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Anonymous Google Employees Voted Arms Control Persons of ... by avmich on Thursday January 10, 2019 @05:37PM (#18879057)

I read this - "If you don't make the decision, it gets made for you in the other direction" - and I understand that just as GP wrote.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Anonymous Google Employees Voted Arms Control Persons of ... by darawk on Thursday January 10, 2019 @05:47PM (#18879135)

And how exactly does that mean "if we don't get them, they'll get us"? What it means is that not acting is as much an action as doing so.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Anonymous Google Employees Voted Arms Control Persons of ... by avmich on Thursday January 10, 2019 @06:21PM (#18879487)

Not acting is always as much an action as doing so, if you consider actions abstractly. In this case I don't think it deserves stating.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Anonymous Google Employees Voted Arms Control Persons of ... by darawk on Thursday January 10, 2019 @07:00PM (#18879748)

It did in the context of what I was replying to, which is why I stated it.

[ Parent | on HN ]