ASP.NET MVC 3 Release Candidate

Re:ASP.NET MVC 3 Release Candidate by abrudtkuhl on Tuesday November 09, 2010 @03:33PM (#1887803)

I know! They iterate pretty fast. I love it but it's hard to keep up

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:ASP.NET MVC 3 Release Candidate by DougBTX on Tuesday November 09, 2010 @04:51PM (#1888079)

If you've not read it, a classic Joel article: Fire And Motion http://www.joelonsoftware.com/articles/fog0000000339.html

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:ASP.NET MVC 3 Release Candidate by sk5t on Tuesday November 09, 2010 @08:07PM (#1888736)

An interesting article... applies very well to the LINQ2SQL / EMF / ADO.NET quagmire. Not so much to fairly mild iterations of MVC.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:ASP.NET MVC 3 Release Candidate by fiveo on Tuesday November 09, 2010 @09:11PM (#1888874)

What about ASP.NET, ASP.NET 1.1, ASP.NET 2.0, ASP.NET AJAX, and now ASP.NET MVC + varieties of view engine?

What about WinForms, WPF, Silverlight?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:ASP.NET MVC 3 Release Candidate by newt on Wednesday November 10, 2010 @07:54AM (#1890090)

Winforms to WPF was about 20 years, and a sorely needed change.

Silverlight is iterating quite quickly, but then they have WPF to build on.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:ASP.NET MVC 3 Release Candidate by fiveo on Wednesday November 10, 2010 @09:52AM (#1890441)

I'm talking about WinForms .NET. .NET itself is not even 10 years old.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:ASP.NET MVC 3 Release Candidate by newt on Friday November 12, 2010 @08:45AM (#1897577)

What's the difference? Winforms.Net is merely a thin wrapper of regular Winforms.

[ Parent | on HN ]