News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on ASP.NET MVC 3 Release Candidate. Parent comment

Re:ASP.NET MVC 3 Release Candidate by sk5t on Tuesday November 09, 2010 @08:07PM (#1888736)
An interesting article... applies very well to the LINQ2SQL / EMF / ADO.NET quagmire. Not so much to fairly mild iterations of MVC.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:ASP.NET MVC 3 Release Candidate by fiveo on Tuesday November 09, 2010 @09:11PM (#1888874)
What about ASP.NET, ASP.NET 1.1, ASP.NET 2.0, ASP.NET AJAX, and now ASP.NET MVC + varieties of view engine?

What about WinForms, WPF, Silverlight?

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:ASP.NET MVC 3 Release Candidate by newt on Wednesday November 10, 2010 @07:54AM (#1890090)
Winforms to WPF was about 20 years, and a sorely needed change.

Silverlight is iterating quite quickly, but then they have WPF to build on.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:ASP.NET MVC 3 Release Candidate by fiveo on Wednesday November 10, 2010 @09:52AM (#1890441)
I'm talking about WinForms .NET. .NET itself is not even 10 years old.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:ASP.NET MVC 3 Release Candidate by newt on Friday November 12, 2010 @08:45AM (#1897577)
What's the difference? Winforms.Net is merely a thin wrapper of regular Winforms.
[ Parent | on HN ]