Microsoft Bing not only shows child pornography, it suggests it

Re:Microsoft Bing not only shows child pornography, it sugge... by hirundo on Thursday January 10, 2019 @03:44PM (#18877946)

> There is no blurry line here. Child abuse and child pornography are clearly defined terms.

In many places around the world it's clearly defined to include purely fictional depictions. It seems to be rare, but there have been convictions for possessing child pornography cartoons in the US.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_status_of_drawn_pornogra...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Microsoft Bing not only shows child pornography, it sugge... by kiriakasis on Thursday January 10, 2019 @05:07PM (#18878750)

I believe in many places it is illegal to distribute even a novel with explicit CP.

A relevant note is the distinction between production, distribution and possession (both directly or indirectly) when talking about corner cases.

A 14 years old should not be incriminated of producing or possessing photos of his/her naked body, he or she could be incriminated of distribution in extreme cases (the cited case should not be one of these cases)

[ Parent | on HN ]