Re:The richest families in Florence in 1427 are still the ri...
by bryanrasmussen on Thursday January 10, 2019 @02:30PM
(#18877196)
so the richest families in Florence in 1427 were the 0.001 percent? At any rate it seemed to have worked for them.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The richest families in Florence in 1427 are still the ri...
by rock_hard on Thursday January 10, 2019 @03:24PM
(#18877708)
Its called survivor bias :)
Re:The richest families in Florence in 1427 are still the ri...
by bryanrasmussen on Thursday January 10, 2019 @03:50PM
(#18877992)
so you're saying that there are a number of formerly rich families at the time who have not made it to the present with wealth intact? I guess that seems reasonable, but don't have any data yet. On the other hand there should still be some wealth today that was not among the wealthiest then?
(of course I wonder how much of that maintaining wealth was - instead of gold, art, and land - strategic marriage)
Re:The richest families in Florence in 1427 are still the ri...
by rebuilder on Thursday January 10, 2019 @04:17PM
(#18878279)
Certainly there are a good number of formerly rich, now poor or extinct families. It's practically a cliché of nobility.
Re:The richest families in Florence in 1427 are still the ri...
by bryanrasmussen on Friday January 11, 2019 @03:18AM
(#18881773)
yes, it seems likely, even 'certain' but as I understand it also seems not to have been verified using data in this case? I like my certainties verified.