In reality, the vast majority of things that need doing in the world are pretty mundane. Most of us just have a small part in a mundane machine. But that does't mean it's not a part that matters. It just doesn't matter very much, because you are one of 7 billion people. And that's OK.
"He is joined in the misemployment ranks by people who make cigarettes, addictive but sterile television shows, badly designed condos, ill-fitting and shoddy clothes, deceptive advertisements, artery-clogging biscuits and highly-sugared drinks (however delicious)."
I think our bullshit jobs guy is a bullshit writer, personally. Shoddy condos, you might not like, but they provide housing. Shoddy clothes provide warmth. You might not like it, you might not agree with the incentives behind it, but they can be and are important parts of some people's existence.
https://www.theschooloflife.com/thebookoflife/unemployment-d...
Are you saying that you think any non-world-changing job is bullshit or that you think other people hold that view?
Either way, this is a bullshit definition. Growing food isn't a "bullshit" job but also doesn't change the world. Most jobs don't "change the world", regardless of how important they are. Most people who think they are changing the world are just self-delusional.
I do not hold that view.
I'm sorry if that was unclear in my comment. I basically agree with everything you said.
I've see this said similarly before but find it unbelievable. Why would any company want to employ people en masse as a benefit primarily for the employees?
How would that even arise? And if it did, how wouldn't another more efficient company out-compete them?
I accept that it's possible companies don't want to invest in or take the risk of automation, but that's nothing like it being some kind of conscious UBI-like policy decision.