News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Meat-free 'Impossible Burger 2.0' tastes even closer to t... by malkia on Tuesday January 08, 2019 @09:56AM (#18855858)
And probably still not a great choice for diabetics... Unless it's made only of fat & protein....
Re:Meat-free 'Impossible Burger 2.0' tastes even closer to t... by sithadmin on Tuesday January 08, 2019 @10:08AM (#18855946)
Per the article:

>It has as much bioavailable iron and protein as the same size serving of ground beef, with 14 grams of fat and 240 calories per quarter-pound patty.

Also, per Impossible's site, changes to nutrition for the new recipe are:

>The new Impossible Burger features 30% less sodium and 40% less saturated fat than the current recipe and just as much protein as 80/20 ground beef from cows

The original recipe only has 5g of carbohydrates per serving, so assuming that remains constant, this doesn't seem terribly problematic for those on a low-to-moderate carbohydrate diet.

Re:Meat-free 'Impossible Burger 2.0' tastes even closer to t... by jawngee on Tuesday January 08, 2019 @02:38PM (#18858828)
Protein affects blood sugar too. General rule for type 1's is to bolus insulin 50% of the listed protein as carbs.

I don't agree with the parent poster's assertion either though.

Re:Meat-free 'Impossible Burger 2.0' tastes even closer to t... by DDebbieDDowner on Tuesday January 08, 2019 @11:03AM (#18856492)
>It has as much bioavailable iron and protein as the same size serving of ground beef

Which ofc it's nothing but marketing nonsense considering that the most bioavailable form of iron Heme-iron is found only in meats.

Re:Meat-free 'Impossible Burger 2.0' tastes even closer to t... by ufo on Tuesday January 08, 2019 @01:04PM (#18857752)
Impossible burger's recipe features large amounts of soy leghemoglobin, sourced from transgenic yeast.
Re:Meat-free 'Impossible Burger 2.0' tastes even closer to t... by moate on Tuesday January 08, 2019 @01:06PM (#18857774)
"Most" doesn't mean "only". Non-heme iron is real, I promise.

Hell they could really cheat and just throw ferrous sulfate directly in the mix rather than using naturally occurring iron in the veggies.

Re:Meat-free 'Impossible Burger 2.0' tastes even closer to t... by DDebbieDDowner on Tuesday January 08, 2019 @01:51PM (#18858288)
"Most" doesn't mean "only". Non-heme iron is real, I promise.

No, it means that the Non-heme is less bioavailable i.e less efficiently absorbed from the body.

Re:Meat-free 'Impossible Burger 2.0' tastes even closer to t... by moate on Tuesday January 08, 2019 @02:27PM (#18858715)
If I give you 100G of iron at 10% bioavailabilty , and Tom 10G at 100% absorption, who absorbed more iron?

If you insist on reading the statement as "this burger has non-heme iron at quantities comparable to heme iron in meat that will also be just as bio-available" then yes, it's impossible.

However, I was trying to point out that there are several ways of reading that statement without it being marketing doublespeak.

TL;dr- I think we're arguing different points here.

Re:Meat-free 'Impossible Burger 2.0' tastes even closer to t... by nindalf on Tuesday January 08, 2019 @10:00AM (#18855884)
Speaking as someone who will likely be diabetic in a decade, that's just too bad. You can't solve every problem with a product like this.
Re:Meat-free 'Impossible Burger 2.0' tastes even closer to t... by jawngee on Tuesday January 08, 2019 @02:42PM (#18858882)
As a parent of a T1D, statements like these are mildly infuriating. I'm sure you're joking, of course, but being resigned to some idea that you are going to develop type 2 at some point is lazy and lame.
Re:Meat-free 'Impossible Burger 2.0' tastes even closer to t... by nickik on Tuesday January 08, 2019 @10:29AM (#18856159)
They designed this to be almost identical to meat. Its primary fat & protein. It was a design goal to match a normal burger specially for low carb people.