Re:Meat-free 'Impossible Burger 2.0' tastes even closer to t...
by moate on Tuesday January 08, 2019 @02:27PM
(#18858715)
If I give you 100G of iron at 10% bioavailabilty , and Tom 10G at 100% absorption, who absorbed more iron?
If you insist on reading the statement as "this burger has non-heme iron at quantities comparable to heme iron in meat that will also be just as bio-available" then yes, it's impossible.
However, I was trying to point out that there are several ways of reading that statement without it being marketing doublespeak.
TL;dr- I think we're arguing different points here.
No, it means that the Non-heme is less bioavailable i.e less efficiently absorbed from the body.