News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Linux 5.0-rc1 by azhenley on Sunday January 06, 2019 @09:56PM (#18842402)
I went to see what the big changes were to justify a new major version number and saw:

“The numbering change is not indicative of anything special. If you want to have an official reason, it's that I ran out of fingers and toes to count on, so 4.21 became 5.0”

I laughed out loud.

Re:Linux 5.0-rc1 by Waterluvian on Sunday January 06, 2019 @10:04PM (#18842445)
I can't help myself. I need to know why 5.0. Is there a reason, even a pointless one? Or is it truly a "just because" moment?
Re:Linux 5.0-rc1 by zanny on Monday January 07, 2019 @01:13AM (#18843173)
Its seriously just Linus doesn't like counting past 20. We only got 4.20 for the weed meme.

3.19 -> 4.0 and 4.20 -> 5.0 just because.

Re:Linux 5.0-rc1 by uranusjr on Sunday January 06, 2019 @11:03PM (#18842690)
It probably is simply “just because”. Not the first time Linus feels it, IIRC 3.0 was basically bumped for the same non-reason.
Re:Linux 5.0-rc1 by hornetblack on Sunday January 06, 2019 @11:57PM (#18842878)
I think there was at least a Google+ poll.
Re:Linux 5.0-rc1 by techntoke on Sunday January 06, 2019 @10:31PM (#18842557)
Because 4.20 was a very special release.
Re:Linux 5.0-rc1 by wungsten on Sunday January 06, 2019 @10:08PM (#18842473)
Any reason you choose :)

From the OP email:

| So go wild. Make up your own reason for why it's 5.0.

Re:Linux 5.0-rc1 by Waterluvian on Sunday January 06, 2019 @11:48PM (#18842836)
Because 4.22 would unfairly wear down the 2 key.
Re:Linux 5.0-rc1 by usaphp on Sunday January 06, 2019 @10:30PM (#18842553)
> even a pointless one

> I ran out of fingers and toes to count on

Re:Linux 5.0-rc1 by djsumdog on Sunday January 06, 2019 @11:36PM (#18842777)
I mean, that's the way it's been forever. IIRC, the release for 3.0 had the same type of message with it. There was no big breaking change, it just felt like it was time to bump the big number.
Re:Linux 5.0-rc1 by craftyguy on Monday January 07, 2019 @04:16AM (#18843865)
The kernel versioning (as of 3.0) has always been arbitrary. Go wild.
Re:Linux 5.0-rc1 by irq on Sunday January 06, 2019 @10:54PM (#18842641)
OK so Linus, like most, has 10 fingers and 10 toes: totaling 20.. Yet 4.21 was already assigned. What was the last thing he counted on? Guesses below.
Re:Linux 5.0-rc1 by ianai on Sunday January 06, 2019 @11:46PM (#18842826)
Actually it’s enough to know that you’re beyond all appendages. Ie one plus all fingers+toes.
Re:Linux 5.0-rc1 by sigstoat on Sunday January 06, 2019 @11:21PM (#18842751)
whatever it was, he was using a lot of it back for the 1.3 series, which made it up to 1.3.100 at least.
Re:Linux 5.0-rc1 by andrewshadura on Monday January 07, 2019 @03:08AM (#18843596)
I believe most people, Linus included, have 8 fingers and 2 thumbs, making it 10 digits in total.
Re:Linux 5.0-rc1 by tsukikage on Monday January 07, 2019 @04:27AM (#18843903)
...but you can count to 256 on 8 fingers...