News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Start with a Website, Not a Mobile App by oftenwrong on Friday January 04, 2019 @02:18PM (#18826839)
Companies saddle their mobile web experience with excessive animations, gobs of dynamic elements, screen-hogging navigation bars/sharing buttons/overlays, poorly-implemented infinite scrolling, etc, etc... and then they conclude that mobile web sites are bad and native apps are good.

People have forgotten that you can build a website that isn't a user-hostile SPA train-wreck.

Re:Start with a Website, Not a Mobile App by xd1936 on Friday January 04, 2019 @04:36PM (#18827872)
Amen. Twitter[1] and Starbucks[2] have both built gorgeous PWAs in the last couple of years that are perfect replacements for 98% of a native app's functionality. It can be done, people!

1. https://blog.twitter.com/engineering/en_us/topics/open-sourc...

2. https://twitter.com/davidbrunelle/status/905931990444244995

Re:Start with a Website, Not a Mobile App by charleslmunger on Saturday January 05, 2019 @12:28AM (#18830088)
Twitter's mobile web site is the most unreliable site I encounter with any frequency. Fully 80% of the links I get to Twitter fail to load, telling me to try again, which only works when I fully refresh the page.

I don't know how it compares to their native app.

Re:Start with a Website, Not a Mobile App by lowercased on Friday January 04, 2019 @05:21PM (#18828265)
Done in-house, I'd bet, and that's another disconnect to overcome.

Outsourcing website and/or mobile dev to external company, the focus is often more going to be on whizbangflashy, vs sleek/slim/fast/simple, to justify whatever budget they're getting.

I do find that I end up using the mobile web client for twitter as often as i do the native client. It's not much in either case, but the mobile web client is generally 'good enough' such that if that's where I land, I don't feel a need to jump to the native client.