Re:Singapore activist found guilty of hosting ‘illegal assem...
by brianpgordon on Friday January 04, 2019 @09:01AM
(#18824065)
I'm not sure that a recorded video would have been the same. The source for the techcrunch article says:
> The Singapore Police Force in an earlier statement, said that Wham had organised an indoor public assembly featuring a foreign speaker, which required a Police permit.
Although given that political films are also banned, maybe a prerecorded video would have been illegal under a different law.
> The Singapore Police Force in an earlier statement, said that Wham had organised an indoor public assembly featuring a foreign speaker, which required a Police permit.
Although given that political films are also banned, maybe a prerecorded video would have been illegal under a different law.