Show HN: Jetpack – Webpack made more convenient

Re:Show HN: Jetpack – Webpack made more convenient by guessmyname on Thursday January 03, 2019 @06:28PM (#18820426)

Searching for “jetpack” in a fresh —no cookies— browser session returns:

• https://jetpack.com/

• https://twitter.com/jetpack

• https://wordpress.org/plugins/jetpack/

Which are the canonical URLs for JetPack, by Automatic.

KidkArolis will have a hard time promoting his project.

---

My suggestion for KidkArolis is to rename his project to one fo these:

• “ConvePack” considering the slogan “Webpack made more convenient”

• “WrapPack” considering the description “Jetpack wraps webpack”

• “SimplePack” assuming his project is simpler than WebPack

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Show HN: Jetpack – Webpack made more convenient by ksec on Friday January 04, 2019 @01:03AM (#18822281)

OR JustPack?

I remember one of the main Goal of WebPack 5 was sane defaults. ( I cant find the post anymore ) So hopefully the WebPack team can learn a lot from JetPack.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Show HN: Jetpack – Webpack made more convenient by franciscop on Thursday January 03, 2019 @06:54PM (#18820611)

I had very similar critic of "server js", but with enough backlinks and a bit of time it seems to be solved. Though it's not exactly the same, in my case it was because of "noise", in this case it'd because of a competing brand. I'd say keep jetpack to see how it turns out, they are vastly different projects.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Show HN: Jetpack – Webpack made more convenient by Jarwain on Thursday January 03, 2019 @08:59PM (#18821367)

What about rocketpack, to fit its current naming theme?

Or spiderpack?

Netpack?

Silkpack?

[ Parent | on HN ]