And the iPace owners are absolutely glowing in their reviews of the car in a way I've never heard Tesla owners get. Indeed--while most Tesla owners I know talk their heads off about the charging network[1], they tend to be defensive about the actual quality of the car itself in ways that luxury car buyers shouldn't be.
[1] While Tesla has a geographically large charging network, it's density is pretty horrible. In DTLA for example, you're 9 miles away from the closest Supercharger, and condo/apartment dwellers are SOL for installing their own unless they want to pay excessive fees to have one installed in their parking spot. There are a number of standard EV chargers through the downtown area, and the number of non-Tesla chargers exceeds the number of Tesla-only chargers by a factor of at least 10:1.
Also, I've ridden in all of the Teslas (including the Roadsters, thanks to a former boss who collected cars) and the Model 3, while comfortable enough, is only roughly as comfortable as my Camry and certainly isn't as comfortable as the $65k+ cars other friends drive. IMO, this is Tesla's big problem. Their cars are expensive, but you're paying a lot of money for the brand and while that can get you started, in the auto market you eventually have to start competing based on features like comfort, etc.
It’s more fun to drive than my old Camero SS. It’s more comfortable than my old Infiniti. I absolutely love the interior aesthetic. And I just paid $3,500 to PPF wrap it because I think it’s absolutely gorgeous and I want to keep it looking that way.
Oh, and I paid $45k not $65k, and it saves me at least $100 a month on top of that.
You are blowing smoke with “roughly as comfortable as a Camry”. The ride quality is better than BMW in my opinion, and that’s before throwing in the mental benefits of Autopilot combined with no engine noise making my commute the most peaceful part of my day.
[1] https://electrek.co/2017/12/21/tesla-tsla-tops-customer-sati...
https://www.cheatsheet.com/money-career/the-biggest-problems...
That's sort of the point, the Supercharger network is designed to facilitate long distance travel. So the stations are spread out along highways. The other networks are bunched up in cities. Try using plugshare.com to plan a trip using CCS chargers vs Superchargers. Say San Francisco to Portland, or Denver to Dallas, or LA to New York.
But yes... I expect Toyota to have more affordable TCO, particularly on the maintenance side where Tesla gets ripped often. The will need to adjust to be competitive outside the luxury market.
For example, if every BMW or Audi dealership had some charging spots for owners of their cars, it would probably have more nationwide coverage than Tesla's Supercharger network. The dealerships are also frequently located in convenient places near major highway exits, etc.
Being able to charge at your local shopping center is nice but it's not a necessity for electric car ownership.
Even if people wanted to charge at dealerships, dealerships aren't incentivized to sell electric cars, much less charge them.
The proof is that any Chevy dealer that sells the Bolt should have a public charger already, but I'm guessing few do.
Putting universal chargers at existing gas stations or buying an entire brand and converting to charging makes way more sense.
* Seattle
* Bellevue
* Fife
Or if you go via PDX.
The dealer in the tri cities or Yakima is out of the way and the one in Spokane would add a couple hours of driving time.
There are no dealers on the direct route home for me. Realistically I could only stop at one.