News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Windows file access performance compared to Linux. Parent comment

Re:Windows file access performance compared to Linux by gsich on Saturday December 29, 2018 @04:03PM (#18785655)
You know any alternative to Picasa? Especially in regards to face recognition? Google Photos is objectively shit, as you need to upload all photos for that.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Windows file access performance compared to Linux by bedros on Saturday December 29, 2018 @06:00PM (#18786219)
There is digikam for Linux (KDE) with facial recognition, I just started playing with it last night, I tested it on a small group of photos, and good so far,
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Windows file access performance compared to Linux by gsich on Saturday December 29, 2018 @06:09PM (#18786254)
Tried it, unfortunately it has huge problems with large collections. Face recognition is sadly way worse too.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Windows file access performance compared to Linux by nreilly on Saturday December 29, 2018 @04:41PM (#18785884)
Depending on your platform - Apple's Photos is pretty good with facial recognition, and it's all done on device.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Windows file access performance compared to Linux by gsich on Saturday December 29, 2018 @06:10PM (#18786257)
On which device? I can install macOS in a VM. Transferring all photos to a iPhone just for tagging seems ridiculous.
[ Parent | on HN ]