Re:PayPal has permanently banned The Hacker News and hold fu...
by 1001101 on Saturday December 29, 2018 @12:09PM
(#18784528)
Cutting a business off from the financial system seems like a fairly harsh punishment for plagiarism, especially when there are other routes for a remedy. We may never know if that was the reason, though, so it's hard to measure whether justice was done or not.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:PayPal has permanently banned The Hacker News and hold fu...
by judge2020 on Saturday December 29, 2018 @12:20PM
(#18784587)
I suspect that one of the sites they plagiarized which accept PP donations/subscriptions asked PP to take them off or risk the large news company switching to another payment processor.
Re:PayPal has permanently banned The Hacker News and hold fu...
by abnry on Saturday December 29, 2018 @02:26PM
(#18785248)
I don't know if it is too harsh. What seems unfair is that paypal gives no reason.
Re:PayPal has permanently banned The Hacker News and hold fu...
by SmellyGeekBoy on Saturday December 29, 2018 @12:21PM
(#18784591)
Well, there's plagiarism and then there's impersonating a well-known (admittedly in niche circles) brand to make money. I think they made a good call here.
Re:PayPal has permanently banned The Hacker News and hold fu...
by slang800 on Sunday January 06, 2019 @11:14PM
(#18842725)
So, rather than using our existing copyright / trademark system to handle cases of brand impersonation or stealing content, we're just going to rely on payment processor companies to punish people? That sounds like a really bad idea.