Re:Fundamental rule of traffic: building new roads makes peo...
by ryandrake on Friday December 28, 2018 @07:06PM
(#18780529)
Plus, you can’t just go into an area with infrastructure capable of supporting 10k people and Just Add Housing™. What about the electric grid? Water and sewer? Schools, parking, trash pickup, etc. You have to have a plan to update all of these. The simple solution of just building urban apartment blocks everywhere won’t work.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Fundamental rule of traffic: building new roads makes peo...
by closeparen on Friday December 28, 2018 @10:47PM
(#18781681)
We’ve built cities before, we can do it again. Infrastructure is cheaper with economies of scale than in sprawl. Remember, the people you don’t house still exist and live somewhere.
Re:Fundamental rule of traffic: building new roads makes peo...
by woah on Saturday December 29, 2018 @04:15AM
(#18782773)
What a sad perspective. How did anything ever get built in the first place?
Re:Fundamental rule of traffic: building new roads makes peo...
by zozbot123 on Friday December 28, 2018 @07:47PM
(#18780819)
>What about the electric grid? Water and sewer? Schools, parking, trash pickup, etc.
Property taxes can pay for these updates once the additional housing is built, it's self-financing. (Of course this won't work in CA, due to Prop 13. But then again, it was a ballot initiative, and those crazy folks in California voted for it. It's all self-inflicted pain on their part.)
Re:Fundamental rule of traffic: building new roads makes peo...
by closeparen on Sunday December 30, 2018 @11:57AM
(#18790031)
The usual response here is that existing residents shouldn’t be taxed to pay for later arrivals’ infrastructure needs.