News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Please do not attempt to simplify this code. Parent comment

Re:Please do not attempt to simplify this code by nindalf on Thursday December 27, 2018 @05:43PM (#18773302)
I agree with the spirit of what you're saying. Too often I've seen folks on HN dismiss languages because they didn't have features X or Y, usually with a condescending "maybe this language's creators should read some PL theory". I remember circa 2013 or 2014, it became impossible to read threads related to Go because the entire thread would always be "a Real Language(TM) needs Generics". Look at the success Go has seen in the last decade while doing the opposite of what HN thought was correct.

That said, there do exist useful products written in Haskell. For example, Facebook writes a lot of spam fighting code in Haskell. https://code.fb.com/security/fighting-spam-with-haskell/

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Please do not attempt to simplify this code by willtim on Friday December 28, 2018 @04:27AM (#18775767)
The lack of "generics" (parametric polymorphism) in Go has certainly made the incidental complexity in Kubenetes much higher: https://medium.com/@arschles/go-experience-report-generics-i...

Go and Haskell are really at different ends of a spectrum. Haskell is a very high level language, which makes building and reasoning about very complex software much easier (at the expense of a learning curve and fine control of space usage).

Go is a low-level language with no learning curve and a very limited facility to abstract (by design it seems).

Personally I would have written something like Kubenetes in Haskell or OCaml, with perhaps the odd performance critical section in C or Rust.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Please do not attempt to simplify this code by jamougha on Friday December 28, 2018 @08:48AM (#18776658)
Ocaml has a GIL. I've worked with people trying to build a distributed system in a language with a GIL and do not recommend it.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Please do not attempt to simplify this code by yawaramin on Sunday December 30, 2018 @02:23AM (#18787930)
OCaml will lose the GIL when multicore lands in ... the next few years I guess :-)
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Please do not attempt to simplify this code by dsirola on Friday December 28, 2018 @05:54AM (#18776086)
It's part of the Blub Paradox[1]. If you don't know about better things, you won't miss them. But once you do know about more powerful things, it's hard to go back to living without them.

[1] http://paulgraham.com/avg.html

[ Parent | on HN ]