News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:C++20 Ranges by humanrebar on Saturday December 22, 2018 @09:59PM (#18744123)
Your viewpoint is valid.

But so is the viewpoint that one of the major problems with C++ culture is the misconception that developer experience and high quality tooling are afterthoughts and orthogonal to "quality". In this viewpoint, readability in a editor or IDE at least as important as readability in a browser or email.

Re:C++20 Ranges by fermienrico on Saturday December 22, 2018 @10:07PM (#18744146)
I agree that C++ is a big mess.

Complaining about an external third party library that is trying to fix the issues for its compile time and how fast it loads IDE is very obtuse and unfair. Boost is a bandaid. Don't complain about the bandaid, complain about what causes the wound. Overall, I agree with you that C++ has poor user-experience - don't blame Boost for it!

Re:C++20 Ranges by int_19h on Sunday December 23, 2018 @04:11AM (#18745199)
To be fair, it is very common to hear "well, why don't you just use Boost?" in response to the criticism of the C++ standard library. It may be an external third party library in name, but in practice it has long since became stdlib++ for idiomatic C++, and a testing ground for new libraries to be eventually adopted into the standard.