Re:As the U.S. fantasizes, the rest of the world builds new ...
by soheil on Saturday December 22, 2018 @07:37PM
(#18743528)
Then there is the argument why should the rest of the country pay for something that will only be used in the coasts or densely populated areas?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:As the U.S. fantasizes, the rest of the world builds new ...
by melling on Saturday December 22, 2018 @08:23PM
(#18743726)
1. Who said they would?
2. Also, it appears that many states already get a lot more than they contribute. That subsidy probably isn’t going in the direction you think it is.
https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2014/05/which-s...
Re:As the U.S. fantasizes, the rest of the world builds new ...
by soheil on Saturday December 22, 2018 @08:36PM
(#18743798)
> 1. Who said they would?
That's my question.
> 2. Also, it appears that many states already get a lot more than they contribute. That subsidy probably isn’t going in the direction you think it is.
Sure, I'm not arguing that the distribution of federal money is 100% fair.
Re:As the U.S. fantasizes, the rest of the world builds new ...
by melling on Saturday December 22, 2018 @11:14PM
(#18744384)
“Then there is the argument why should the rest of the country pay for something that will only be used in the coasts or densely populated areas?”
This isn’t a real question. You’re making up a reason that you haven’t proven exists.
There is no funded HSR outside of California.
Re:As the U.S. fantasizes, the rest of the world builds new ...
by soheil on Sunday December 23, 2018 @02:07AM
(#18744868)
What part of it is not a "real" question? Are you saying there are assumptions in the question? Of course, the entire argument is hypothetical since currently there isn't a train system as described above in the US. The point of the comment was to seek predictive reasons in favor and against a hypothetical scenario. This has nothing to do with existing funding inside or outside CA. You seem confused.